Start new topic
Ban Chemical Weapons
 
Regional Consensus
Support [ 2 ]  [50.00%]
Against [ 2 ]  [50.00%]
Abstain [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 4
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Jun 12 2005, 01:15 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
Ban Chemical Weapons
A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.


Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Mayakovskia

Description: The United Nations,

NOTING the positive consequences of Resolution 16, "Elimination of Bio Weapons", to global security and human welfare;

NOTING ALSO the precedents set by the following Resolutions: 40 (Banning the use of Landmines); 51 (Children in War); 57 (Reduce Black Market Arms Sales); 75 (The Nuclear Terrorism Act); 83 (The Eon Convention on Genocide); and 92 (Humanitarian Intervention) and their positive contributions to global security and human welfare;

REGRETTING that, although there are specific laws banning the trafficking and use of biological and nuclear weapons, there are as yet no such laws on chemical weapons;

BELIEVING that the world should be free of chemical weapons, as it now is of biological weapons;

RESOLVES to ban all production and trafficking in chemical weapons, and to take steps towards the ultimate decommissioning of all chemical weapons currently in existence.

Votes For: 4,278

Votes Against: 2,003
Abattoir
Pinprick of Apathy
****
Posts: 398
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 12 2005, 01:18 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
It'll never work...Against
Abattoir
Pinprick of Apathy
****
Posts: 398
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 12 2005, 01:22 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Well, since even Adolf Hitler was against chemical weapons (because he personally experienced them in the first world war) I support the proposal. CCs are really bad and something for Saddam Hussein...
Latao
Emperor
*****
Posts: 535
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Jun 13 2005, 03:55 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
All WMDs are banned under Bettian law anyway so this resolution wouldn't affect us one bit. Anyhow, we'll support this one.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Jun 13 2005, 11:47 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
We are AGAINST . This would allow non-UN nations to threaten UN nations with these weapons; and since bio-weapons were banned the UN nations would have to NUKE the aggressor nation.
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 15 2005, 01:08 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
What a wonder, Terrorist-Equipment seller Lamoni is against the idea as it would -explicitive removed- up their business... ph34r.gif
Latao
Emperor
*****
Posts: 535
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Jun 16 2005, 12:40 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Latao @ Jun 14 2005, 11:08 PM)
What a wonder, Terrorist-Equipment seller Lamoni is against the idea as it would -explicitive removed- up their business... ph34r.gif

I would like to point out that Lamoni has NEVER sold weapons to terrorists. Unless you count Omsec.
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 16 2005, 06:06 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Lamoni is a known conscienceless dealer of WMDs. This country should have been invaded, not Latao...
Latao
Emperor
*****
Posts: 535
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Jun 17 2005, 11:20 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
If you don't stop lying, you might well add ANOTHER enemy to your list. Just a hint. wink.gif
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 18 2005, 05:34 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Latao @ Jun 16 2005, 11:06 AM)
Lamoni is a known conscienceless dealer of WMDs. This country should have been invaded, not Latao...

you are a known dealer of WMDs, though, Lamoni tongue.gif
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 18 2005, 07:28 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
That may be true, but Lamoni has never and will never supply weapons to terrorists.
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jun 19 2005, 11:15 AM
PMEmail Poster
 
Had to let this one slip by, apparently I'm supposed to comply...I don't suppose we exactly need chemical weapons.
Abattoir
Pinprick of Apathy
****
Posts: 398
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0181 ]   [ 15 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->