|
|
|
We thought you're such a smart Starblaydi schlong...
RESA: Regional Space Agency
OSA: Oceanian Space Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
, |
 |
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Latao @ Apr 28 2005, 07:01 AM) | We thought you're such a smart Starblaydi schlong...
RESA: Regional Space Agency
OSA: Oceanian Space Agency |
Somehow neither of those really throw out the idea that "Hey, we own these" to the rest of the world  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
how about something along the lines of...
'CAESAOR'
Combined Astro-Exploration Strategy of the Atlantian Oceania Region
me and my acronyms  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
Right, you earned a slap for that. |
 |
 |
|
Falcania |
|
Winging It Since 2004 |
 |
|
|
|
Posts: 776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yes, because AOSEP is soooo much better. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Falcon-boy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
AORSEA - Atlantian Oceania Regional Space Exploration Agency |
|
|
 |
|
Lamoni |
|
Democratic Maniac |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
How about we put aside the creative differences for a moment and just refer to it as the 'AO space program' for now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
That would probably work best, yes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamoni |
|
Democratic Maniac |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
So what else does a good space program need?
(obviously if Starblaydi boffins knew the answer to that, we'd be up there already) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the more obvious needs is a reliable method of getting to space. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamoni |
|
Democratic Maniac |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
The space shuttle, in other words. Jay Industries are working on it as we speak. |
|
|
|
|
|
Falcania |
|
Winging It Since 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
Ignoring the fact you don't actually need a shuttle itself to get into space, and that it's just a handily re-useable vehicle, Starblaydia's vast array of satellites are up there because of our vastly inefficient and very expensive rocketry research.
The point being, we can get up there, but doing anything while we're up there and coming back down to earth while we're at it is the main problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
I would suggest that we start out with researching something like the RL Russian Soyuz space vehicles.
This post has been edited by Lamoni on May 2 2005, 04:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamoni |
|
Democratic Maniac |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
[ Script Execution time: 0.0173 ] [ 12 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]
|
Close Topic Options
