Start new topic
Habeas Corpus
 
Support the Resolution?
yes [ 5 ]  [71.43%]
no [ 2 ]  [28.57%]
abstain [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 7
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Sep 5 2004, 08:22 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Habeas Corpus

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Enn

Description: Habeas Corpus; by the passing of this resolution instituting the legal principle of Habeas Corpus by the voting members, Habeas Corpus will thus be affirmed by the United Nations as a set and irrefutable legal principle to which all member nations and all associated internal agencies are subject.

Recognising that Habeas Corpus is a founding principle of law in many nations, the UN formally adopts Habeas Corpus across all member states.

To clearly define Habeas Corpus:

Habeas Corpus is the legal principle that gives a person the right to not be held without charge. A charge must be filed with the judicial authorities of the country in which the suspected crime is committed within 48 hours of the person being held by police, or any other body charged with the upholding of the nation's laws. This period does not apply to any time when the judicial authorities are not active, such as weekends or national holidays. Habeas Corpus also declares accordingly that once a charge is filed, then the person should be treated as per the Definition of Fair Trial resolution.

Further noting,

If the captured or detained person is a prisoner of war or is captured or detained in an area of military conflict by forces of whom may be recognised as the opposition, then the previously recognised and enforced Wolfish Convention on PoWs and not Habeas Corpus shall apply to his or her treatment. Furthermore, be it hereby resolved that any person who is not detained as a prisoner of war is entitled to Habeas Corpus.

Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Sep 7 2004, 05:38 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
Even I supported this one. Freaking commie pinkos.
Xile
Punch-Drunk Psychosis
****
Posts: 358
Quote Post
 
AOLTop

,
Posted on Sep 7 2004, 06:18 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
I, of course, am the one vote against then. I have a serious problem with these -explicitive removed-ing bastards trying to tell me how to run my -explicitive removed-ing country. They need to stay the hell out of my damn business. I'd resign from the UN but doing so would lose me "power" on Nationstates...however, it is still bull-explicitive removed-.
Abattoir
Pinprick of Apathy
****
Posts: 398
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,
Posted on Sep 9 2004, 04:29 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Lamoni has voted yes as per regional will.
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0173 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->