Start new topic
Labelling Standards (RESOLUTION)
 
Support this resolution?
Yes [ 3 ]  [60.00%]
No [ 2 ]  [40.00%]
Total Votes: 5
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Sep 18 2005, 08:20 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Labeling Standards

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Antrium

Description: SEEING THAT some companies may label their products incorrectly, or misuse words like “fresh“ and “organic“, and also seeing that there is a rising number of people that need to be able to know what is in what they are eating, this proposal imposes the following:

I. If a product is marketed in one or multiple countries that speak different official languages, all labels on the product must be in all official languages of those countries, and must all translate to mean the same thing.

II. Defining “fresh” as “not stale, sour, or decayed” and “not altered by processing,” and defining “organic” as “food produced with the use of feed or fertilizer of plant or animal origin without employment of chemically formulated fertilizers, growth stimulants, antibiotics, or pesticides.” Nothing may be labeled “fresh” or “organic” unless it fits the above definition.

III. All people have the right to know what is in the food they eat. This means all packaged products must be labeled with (if applicable) the ingredients of the product, and nutrition facts, which should include the amount of fat, trans fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, sodium, protein, vitamins and minerals, and calories in the product. Also, all packaged products must be labeled with the country where the product was grown/made.


Votes For: 713

Votes Against: 172

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Thu Sep 22 2005
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Sep 18 2005, 11:38 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Very, um, crucial for the UN to be doing. Point 1 is vaguely useful, Point 2 not so mjuch useful as common sense. better to have this than not, so 'For'.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Sep 18 2005, 12:23 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
The Unified Capitalizt States strongly oppose this resolution. If it passes, sales of Capitalizt products in UN member states, and of UN member state products in Commerce Heights, will be nearly ended, because it is impractical to label most products in all 6 official languages of the States, not to mention the official languages of other nations, in order to comply with this resolution. While ยง2 is already covered by laws against fraud in most nations, we do not believe that governments should be in the business of regulating the use of language.
Commerce Heights
Royal Scribe
***
Posts: 191
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Sep 21 2005, 03:01 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
With a 3-2 majority, the Bettian delegate has voted IN FAVOUR of this resolution.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0228 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->