Start new topic
Repeal 'Protection of Dolphins' (RESOLUTION)
 
Support this resolution?
Yes [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
No [ 3 ]  [75.00%]
Abstain [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 4
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Aug 24 2005, 09:06 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Repeal "Protection of Dolphins Act"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal

Resolution: #106

Proposed by: Omigodtheykilledkenny

Description: UN Resolution #106: Protection of Dolphins Act (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: WHEREAS, the U.N. Protection of Dolphins Act constitutes an encroachment on national sovereignty, in that it claims jurisdiction over international waters -– restricting the rights of nations who have a presence in said waters, violating treaties and trade pacts between nations respecting said waters, and placing special restrictions on any future such treaties; and

WHEREAS, many member states' economies are heavily reliant on fishing and related industries, and this act severely damages their national economies; and

WHEREAS, it is decidedly outside the jurisdiction of the United Nations to place such precise restrictions on international trade and commerce; and

WHEREAS, dolphins are not an endangered species requiring special protection; and

WHEREAS, the sale and consumption of dolphin meat is prevalent in many cultures, and the Protection of Dolphins Act is culturally insensitive in that regard; and

WHEREAS, the Protection of Dolphins Act does little to advance the central purpose of the United Nations, namely, the promotion of human rights; and

WHEREAS, the provision in the Protection of Dolphins Act, calling specifically for the prevention of "dolphin abuse, in any way that (member states) see fit, provided that no dolphin shall ever be preferred over human lives," is insufficient for the protection of human lives and livelihood:

1. THE U.N. PROTECTION OF DOLPHINS ACT IS HEREBY REPEALED.

Votes For: 517

Votes Against: 961

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Sun Aug 28 2005
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Aug 24 2005, 09:09 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
The Bettian delegate is IN FAVOUR of repealing the original act due to the strong arguments presented in this resolution.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Aug 24 2005, 12:11 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
I'm Against this resolution, as I want my perfectly tuned fishbowl when they flee the planet.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Aug 24 2005, 01:46 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Starblaydia @ Aug 24 2005, 10:11 AM)
I'm Against this resolution, as I want my perfectly tuned fishbowl when they flee the planet.

OOC: Someone's been reading the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy again. :Man that was so funny! biggrin.gif: Not that I can complain, I have the book as well.

IC: Lamoni is AGAINST the resolution.

This post has been edited by Lamoni on Aug 24 2005, 01:47 PM
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Aug 29 2005, 07:10 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
With a 1-3 majority, the Betitan delegate voted AGAINST this resolution.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0157 ]   [ 15 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->