Start new topic
RESOLUTION: Repeal 'Protect Historical Sites'
 
Dost thou supportest this resolutione?
Aye, tis truly a worthy resolutione [ 5 ]  [100.00%]
Nay, tis verily crappy, m'lud [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Meh, we shall abstaineth from voting [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 5
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Jun 20 2007, 03:37 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Repeal "Protect Historical Sites" ===> http://www.nationstates.net/48037/page=UN_...utions/start=14

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal
Resolution: #15
Proposed by: Jey

Description: UN Resolution #15: Protect Historical Sites (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The General Assembly of the United Nations,

COMMENDING Resolution #15: "Protect Historical Sites," for its intent to safeguard historically significant locations within member nations;

HOWEVER NOTING that Resolution #15 wholly lacks any apparent methods for which to protect the historical sites referenced to within the resolution text, only saying "we cannot let historical sites go to waste;"

FURTHER NOTING that Resolution #15, at no point within the resolution text, defines what constitutes a "historical site" that is worthy of protection, thus leading to confusion and misunderstandings among member nations;

CONCLUDING that Resolution #15 is an insufficient and ineffectual resolution, given that it lacks any form of implementation of its admirable intent;

REPEALS Resolution #15: "Protect Historical Sites."

Votes For: 21

Votes Against: 17

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Sun Jun 24 2007



PLEASE NOTE: althought the official end of voting is Sunday, I can't guarantee internet access at the weekends so I shall cast the regional vote this Friday instead.

This post has been edited by Bettia on Jun 20 2007, 03:37 AM
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Jun 20 2007, 03:40 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
After casting a quick glimpse at the original resolution, I can see why they want to repeal it. Surely something as important as preserving historical sites is worth more than two badly written lines. It's yet another example of UN clutter, and therefore the Bettian delegate says YES to this repeal.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0186 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->