Start new topic
Repeal 'The Law of the Sea' - RESOLUTION
 
Support this resolution?
Yes [ 7 ]  [100.00%]
No [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Abstain [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Total Votes: 7
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Jan 17 2006, 04:15 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Repeal "The Law of the Sea"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal

Resolution: #74

Proposed by: Gruenberg

Description: UN Resolution #74: The Law of the Sea (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The United Nations,

OBSERVING that non-UN members outnumber UN members 3 to 1,

ASSERTING that the attempts of "The Law of the Sea" to claim UN jurisdiction over international waters are misguided, impractical, and illegal,

FULLY CONVINCED that the 20 kilometre allotments granted by "The Law of the Sea" are far too small without allowance for the extension of Exclusive Economic Zones, and further that the undefined and vague status of 'scientific research stations' could lead to abuse by unscrupulous nations,

BELIEVING that the allotment of fishing quotas is inefficiently administered by "The Law of the Sea", but now falls under the jurisdiction of the UNCoESB,

APPALLED at the extensive bureaucracy created by "The Law of the Sea", which would be largely rendered ineffectual by the presence of non-UN navies, and the lack of legislation governing relations between these and UN navies,

CONCERNED by the conflict between the obligations of ships under "The Law of the Sea", and of declared neutral ships,

DEPLORING the designation of definition of piracy to bilateral definition, which would in fact allow ships at will to disrupt trade, in effect fuelling, rather than preventing, international piracy,

NOT BELIEVING 'reasonable grounds' is sufficiently defined to prevent arbitrary, aggressive boarding of ships, and appalled at the breach of confidentiality created by the UN database of searches,

DISREGARDING the claim that the UN can designate no-fishing areas, given the presence of non-UN fishing boats,

DISBELIEVING the sweeping nature of "The Law of the Sea", in attempting to connect a number of entirely separate concerns, such as international security and ecology, to be a productive approach to internationally binding legislation,

FULLY CONDEMNING "The Law of the Sea" for attempting to assert UN jurisdiction over international territory:

1. REPEALS "The Law of the Sea";

2. IMPLORES the General Assembly to ensure speedy replacement of certain admittedly important aspects of "The Law of the Sea" concerning the sovereignty of territorial waters, and its well-intentioned but ineffectively and dangerously executed attempts to combat piracy.

Votes For: 2,320

Votes Against: 1,901

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Fri Jan 20 2006

This post has been edited by Bettia on Jan 17 2006, 04:18 AM
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Jan 17 2006, 08:04 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Yeah, 20km sucks.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 17 2006, 11:14 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
The whole idea of the UN asserting authority over anything seems a little to NWO for me. That and contrary to the purpose of the UN, which I was in the understanding of that the UN was supposed to help nations work together, not control them.
Khazaron
The Red Devil
*****
Posts: 515
Quote Post
 
AOLTop

,
Posted on Jan 17 2006, 11:30 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Fight da power! Or to put it in more familiar terms... REPEAL AWAY!
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Jan 17 2006, 09:26 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
I remember that a certain military action between myself and Xile happened just after that got passed. Repeal
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 18 2006, 06:38 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Lamoni @ Jan 18 2006, 03:26 AM)
I remember that a certain military action between myself and Xile happened just after that got passed. Repeal

*chuckles*
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 18 2006, 04:00 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Good, now my illegal subsurface radar just outside my territorial waters won't be so illegal anymore... wink.gif j/k.
Pacitalia
The best place on earth.
*****
Posts: 505
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 18 2006, 09:38 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Starblaydia @ Jan 18 2006, 04:38 AM)
QUOTE (Lamoni @ Jan 18 2006, 03:26 AM)
I remember that a certain military action between myself and Xile happened just after that got passed.  Repeal

*chuckles*

What are you laughing at? tongue.gif
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 19 2006, 04:14 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Why, you, of course wink.gif
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 19 2006, 04:47 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
Another "Jesus On Stilts" affair.

REPEAL.
Krytenia
Now With Added Bekk!
*****
Posts: 661
Quote Post
 
YahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 19 2006, 10:04 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
QUOTE (Starblaydia @ Jan 19 2006, 02:14 AM)
Why, you, of course wink.gif

Hmmm... that would be why I laugh at you, then. rolleyes.gif
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Jan 20 2006, 04:12 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Well it unanimous then - with a 7-0-0 majority, the Bettian delegate has voted IN FAVOUR of this repeal.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0193 ]   [ 15 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->