Start new topic
Repeal 'Right To Divorce' - RESOLUTION
 
Support this resolution?
Yes [ 5 ]  [62.50%]
No [ 2 ]  [25.00%]
Abstain [ 1 ]  [12.50%]
Total Votes: 8
Guests cannot vote 
Posted on Dec 22 2005, 10:12 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Repeal "Right to Divorce"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal

Resolution: #135

Proposed by: Fonzoland

Description: UN Resolution #135: Right to Divorce (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The United Nations,

NOTING the recent passage of "Right To Divorce",

CONCERNED at a number of failures of said resolution:

1. OBSERVING that although it 'declares that a marriage or civil union may be ended by divorce', this does not actually guarantee any right to a divorce, meaning the final decision still rests with national or local courts anyway,

2. DEEPLY DISTURBED by clause 3, which enforces parental rights in such a way that it is illegal to deny regular access to the child to a parent who is assessed being a significant risk to the child, even where such parent has been convicted of crimes such as sexual molestation of children or infanticide,

3. BELIEVING it to be fallacious to base post-divorce visitation rights exclusively on the circumstances of divorce,

4. RECOGNISING that it would be better to have visitation privileges determined on a case-by-case basis, considering the facts of the specific situation and giving proper attention to the welfare of the children as well as the rights of the parents,

5. NOTING FURTHER that the definition used in the resolution does not extend any rights to those in polyandrous or polygamous relationships, and as such enforces one particular set of values,

6. CONVINCED that the resolution constitutes an attempt at inappropriate micromanagement, where many of its provisions would be more effectively delegated to national or more local agencies,

7. REMAINING OPEN to the possibility of replacement legislation that legislates a 'right to divorce' without resorting to unnecessary micromanagement:

REPEALS "Right To Divorce".

Submitted on behalf of Gruenberg.

Votes For: 1,034

Votes Against: 268

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Mon Dec 26 2005
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Dec 22 2005, 11:09 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
WHoops, meant to vote yes, so move that one from the no catagory to the yes one.
The Silver Sky
Inexperienced
*
Posts: 11
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Dec 22 2005, 12:25 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
I agree with TSS on this one. This seems to be quite a well-written proposal. FOR.
Khazaron
The Red Devil
*****
Posts: 515
Quote Post
 
AOLTop

,
Posted on Dec 22 2005, 01:27 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
I can't remember how i voted for the Divorce resolution in the first place. so i'll just play it safe and abstain on this one.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Dec 22 2005, 03:16 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
I'm pretty sure you voted no on this one, Star.

Legalese also votes for this Repeal, having been against the Resolution and its micromanagement in the first place.
Legalese
Back in Black
****
Posts: 431
Quote Post
 
AOLTop

,
Posted on Dec 23 2005, 04:17 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Star, your exact words were "I vote no based on the sheer stupidity and waste of man-hours that this farce has used up."

In fact, everyone except Paci voted against the original resolution.

Would you like to change your vote from abstain to yes?
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Dec 23 2005, 05:47 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Wow, I really didn't like this one before, did I?

See, if I vote For, then I'm agreeing to the waste of time used to get rid of a total and utter waste of time. So I think I'll stick with my abstain and refrain from timewasting altogether.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Dec 23 2005, 10:13 AM
PMEmail Poster
 
Anything that gets the U.N.'s nose out of individual nations' business is a good thing. FOR.
Sarzonia
It's all about the Navy.
*****
Posts: 577
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Dec 24 2005, 02:43 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Against.
Pacitalia
The best place on earth.
*****
Posts: 505
Quote Post
 
AOLMSNTop

,
Posted on Dec 24 2005, 01:55 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
For. I didn't much like the original resolution any better than Star did.
Lamoni
Democratic Maniac
********
Posts: 1952
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooMSNTop

,
Posted on Dec 26 2005, 12:17 PM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
With a 6-1-1 majority (including TSS's changed vote), the Bettian delegate has voted FOR this resolution.

This post has been edited by Bettia on Dec 26 2005, 12:18 PM
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,

Topic OptionsReply to this topicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0204 ]   [ 15 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->