Start new topic
AT VOTE: Individual Working Freedoms
 
For, against or Sexily restrain?
For, IWF is da bomb [ 7 ]  [77.78%]
Against, IWF should be blown up [ 1 ]  [11.11%]
Abstain, What is IWF? [ 1 ]  [11.11%]
Total Votes: 9
  
Posted on Sep 5 2006, 07:15 AM
PMEmail Poster
 
Category: Advancement of Industry, Labor Deregulation
The United Nations,

Strongly reaffirming its commitment to individual liberty,

Believing that individuals should be as free as possible from undue government interference in making decisions governing their personal lives,

Convinced that the issues of when, how often, and for how long an individual works should remain an issue for private negotiation between employer and employee,

Recalling the repeal of Resolution #59, "The 40 Hour Workweek", and the reasons therein given for the weaknesses of the prior document,

Dissenting from the view that one standard working week can be determined as a universal diktat, given the diversity of national economies, the particulars of industries working on cyclical, seasonal or other irregular working patterns, and the varying conditions, demographic, environmental, developmental, and otherwise, of member nations,

Considering any attempt to impose a "one size fits all" manacle of working time constriction as a grossly unfair abrogation of individual freedoms,

Desirous of reaching a fair compromise on the issue:

1. Requires member nations to grant their people the greatest possible degree of freedom in determining their terms of employment, with specific regard to working time;

2. Calls upon member nations to respect the rights of individuals to be free to make choices about their terms of employment, and equally of individuals to seek representation or counsel during such negotiations;

3. Mandates the removal of working time regulations that serve only to reduce individual liberty, and that unfairly remove decision-making power from the individual level;

4. Reserves the right of nations to choose whether to set specific regulations on workweeks and working time in the general public interest, so long as such regulations do not unduly abridge the freedom of individuals in deciding their terms of employment;

5. Endorses policies aimed at delegating decisions concerning working time regulations to the most local level possible;

6. Promotes a healthy harmony of national and individual rights in economic decision-making.
Bazalonia
Eating A Bazalope Burger
******
Posts: 774
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Sep 5 2006, 08:05 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Looks good to us. Go for it.
Starblaydia
Also available in purple
********
Posts: 1877
Quote Post
 
MSNTop

,
Posted on Sep 5 2006, 05:55 PM
PMEmail Poster
 
nope, I disagree
Quakmybush
Dedicated Scribe
**
Posts: 84
Quote Post
 
Top

,
Posted on Sep 6 2006, 10:44 AM
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
 
Bettia says AYE - clause 4 of this resolution seems to ensure that there is minimal interference in national internal politics, and on the whole it takes into account the varying customs etc of different countries.
Bettia
We don't do defence
******
Posts: 956
Quote Post
 
AOLYahooTop

,
Posted on Sep 8 2006, 09:15 AM
PMEmail Poster
 
Has voted in favor of this proposal according to regional will.
Bazalonia
Eating A Bazalope Burger
******
Posts: 774
Quote Post
 
Top

,

Topic OptionsClosed TopicMake a quick replyStart new topic

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0238 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

-->